New Release | Kick Out the Bottom
Kick Out the Bottom by Erik Mortenson & Christopher Kramer
Recently I had the chance to sit down with author Erik Mortenson to discuss our collaborative memoir called Kick Out the Bottom (Check out the conversation in the video above). This is a book we've been working on since about 2015 or 2016 so it's nice that it's finally coming out. It's releasing through Cornerstone Press at the end of August. Presales for the print edition have begun (contact www.uwsp.edu/cornerstone or email@example.com).
Kick Out the Bottom is an experimental memoir that chronicles our time in bohemian Detroit at the millennium’s turn. Together we express our views on both the city and a mutual friend who became something of a mystical teacher, introducing us to the occult, magic, yoga, and counterculture ideas. It also attempts to understand and negotiate the obvious racial implications of two white men journeying through a majority-Black city while going through a transformative experience.
Here is the synopsis:
Amidst the ruins of Detroit, two seekers question all that they thought they knew as they struggle to achieve spiritual awakening in this collaborative memoir. Guided by Ryan, an eccentric mystic from the suburbs, the pair explore a ramshackle city while running experiments on themselves in a bid for understanding who they are and what life means. But as the questions Ryan poses deepen, the two are left wondering what happens when you truly “kick out the bottom.”
And here are a few blurbs in support of the book.
“Yes, ‘kick out the jams’ was one generation’s provocation, but Mortenson and Kramer inhabited in their youth a heady mixture of punkish aesthetics and neo-hip mysticism. They give us a Detroit that was on the edge of massive re- transformation even as they were themselves on their way to new modes of living.”
--Aldon Lynn Nielsen
George and Barbara Kelly Professor of American Literature
The Pennsylvania State University
“In Rilkean fashion, Kick Out the Bottom explores characters who are willing to change their lives as they endure an archetypal search for meaning.”
Professor of English, Purdue University
editor of The Cambridge Companion to American Poetry and Politics since 1900
“Kick Out the Bottom is the future of literature, or, to appropriate from the Detroit that the book transcends, we may ask, ‘Is there a Kick Out the Bottom in your future?’”
—Stephen Paul Miller
Professor of English, St. John’s University
author of Being with a Bullet
As my readers know, my writing focuses on magic and mysticism. Through my fiction, I examine philosophical dualities, alternate realities, and spiritual revelations. Erik’s work assesses the Beat generation and the elusive “moment,” as well as underground literature in Turkey. I’m a Detroit native and I met Erik while he was doing his PhD from Wayne State University. If you would like to know more about us, you can check out Erik’s website at https://erikmortenson.wixsite.com/home or my About page.
Thanks for reading and I hope you check out the video. We discuss the challenges of collaborating on this book as well as chat about some behind the scenes stories. And if you would like to order the print edition contact www.uwsp.edu/cornerstone or firstname.lastname@example.org.
That's all for today.
"It may happen that small differences in the initial conditions produce very great ones in the final phenomena.” - Henri Poincare
“Chance is a word void of sense; nothing can exist without a cause.” - Voltaire
I enter my studio like every other evening, sitting down on the bed and looking out the window into the night skyline of Portland, Oregon. As the sound of metropolitan-life increases, my thoughts drift to the many pressures of life and the plethora of different ideas associated with it: civic pressure, stamina, and interpersonal relationships. I glance at my windowsill and as I do this, my eyes pass over a key ring. Without thinking about it, I just stare at the ring. Wait. Those are not my keys, and what are they doing on my windowsill?
Suddenly, I feel paranoia, and look around, wondering if someone has been inside my apartment. Everything looks in order, nothing amiss, no signs of searching or of theft. I lift the keys and study them; they’re all new chrome-plated keys of different shapes and sizes. Upon closer examination, I discover something peculiar: four of the seven keys have “ACE” engraved on them. This may not sound too strange. ACE Hardware sells keys. But to me it’s a sign: Four Aces makes up a winning hand in poker. Most people wouldn't notice. I, however, have a keen interest in symbolic coincidences. I believe in chance, or better yet, I believe in synchronicity: the aligning of two arbitrary events, which actually have a distinct connection.
In this situation, either chance came into play or I’m being stalked? I don’t know why anyone would want to stalk me, so some random event caused the keys to appear on my windowsill and the strange probability of four of them having ACE engraved upon them. How this curious event integrates itself into my life is determined by the knowledge of how these keys appeared and also how my mind sees this “coincidence.”
In the essay, The Process of Individuation, Marie-Louise Von Franz speaks of the theory of “coincidence” as examined from the point of view of Carl Jung’s concept of synchronicity. Von Franz describes synchronicity as “… a “meaningful coincidence” of outer and inner events that are not themselves casually connected.” The symbol of the Four Aces resonates with me because of a personal connection concerning the symbols of the key, gambling, the seven, and the four.
In esoteric theory, the four doors of the four cosmic watchtowers are symbolic ways to describe centering yourself within your psyche; east, west, north, south. To do a mystical banishing, one must petition the four directions. Over the years, I’ve lived a reckless life, which I consider a game that is located high above a game board. Few people understand the rules of this game, but they play. I gamble with my life often. But this gambling produces a profound understanding of the game and its eventual outcome. As far as seven, seven alchemical stages exist to reach the gold, the nirvana, the heaven, the nameless.
Now, this all could be mere coincidence if it weren’t for the resonation within my personal experience. In George B. Hogenson’s The Self, the Symbolic and Synchronicity: Virtual Realities and the Emergence of the Psyche, the differential between chance events and synchronicity is determined by his defense of the archetype. He states:
“All too often, however, we tend to lose sight of this distinction and claim synchronicity when all we really have is chance. Jung’s distinction between the two phenomena rests on the creation of meaning, or the meaningfulness of juxtaposed events. He also remarks that synchronistic events are usually associated with archetypal materials, that they have profound affective and symbolic characteristics, and that they change the order of life.”
The archetype is the connecting principle between the psychic field and physical reality. Von Franz also states:
“Jung stresses the point that since the physical and the psychic realms coincide within the synchronistic event, there must be somewhere or somehow a Unitarian reality—one reality of the physical and psychic realms to which he gave the Latin expression unus mundus, the one world, a concept which already existed in the minds of some mediaeval philosophers.”
The connection to the unus mundus, or one unified reality/world, has always existed, but as human consciousness expands, the sensitivity to the relationship increases. There is a correlation between the machine age and the increase in mind-altering drugs. This may sound ridiculous, but consider how consciousness has changed since the 20th century, since the machine began recording our lives; and since drugs have stimulated the human brain: an organic machine. Our brain is just an organic recording device, no different from the recording process of a mechanical instrument.
In the essay, Magick Squares and Future Beats: The Magical Processes and Methods of William S. Burroughs and Brion Gysin, Genesis Breyer P-Orridge describes a conversation he had with Burroughs concerning consciousness in our modern age:
“Care for a drink? He asked, “Sure’ I replied, nervous and for one of the only times in my life, in awe. “Well, Reality is not all it’s cracked up to be, you know,” he continued. He took the remote and started to flip through the channels, cutting up programmed TV. I realized he was teaching me. At the same time he began to hit stop and start on his Sony TC cassette recorder, mixing in “random” cut-up prior recordings. These were overlaid with our conversation, none acknowledging the other, an instant holography of information and environment. I was already being taught. What Bill explained to me then was pivotal to the unfolding of my life and art: Everything is recorded. If it is recorded, then it can be edited. If it can be edited then the order, sense, meaning, and direction are as arbitrary and personal as the agenda and/or person editing. This is magick. For if we have the ability and/or choice of how things unfold –regardless of the original order and/or intention that they are recorded in –then we have control over the eventual unfolding. If reality consists of a series of parallel recordings that usually go unchallenged, then reality only remains stable and predictable until it is challenged and/or the recordings are altered, or their order changed. These concepts lead us to the release of cut-ups as a magical process.”
Life is a series of cut-ups. This cut-up magical technique is a synchronistic artistic process, where the artisan takes an existing work, and cuts apart portions to randomize and re-assemble them into a new order and meaning. Tristan Tzara created the technique in the 1920s, when he pulled words out of a hat at the Cabaret Voltaire. Burroughs and Gysin improved upon the technique in 1958, by editing each other; They dubbed this collaboration The Third Mind. This is the technique in which Burroughs ordered his chapters in his novel Naked Lunch (1945). Written language is nothing more than another recording process, and the techniques of magical randomization can apply to this, as well as to physical reality. The truth of existence is being randomized, and it produced patterns; all these patterns are meaningful, none a coincidence. The same law of patterning placed the Four Aces in my windowsill as the cut-up.
It’s imperative to understand that the synchronistic event and the cut-up are entryways into the subconscious. Therefore, when the conscious mind bypasses logic, the “other within” emerges and taps into the indefinable power of the random organization. The tenuous relationship that exists between reality and chance defies logic. Chance and logic seem to contradict one another. It's logical to believe that ordered systems are in place and that each system has an element of unpredictability. In the purest sense of reality, this is not an accurate statement; chance exists as a complex chaotic system with its own law; it is an anarchic system within a system of order; they are both random and predictable if you understand its language.
In 1909, the English artist and occultist Austin Osman Spare took the cut-up technique and began experimenting with sigilization. The sigil is an ancient magical technique that affects the collective subconscious. Magicians as far back as King Solomon experimented with the technique. There are many versions of how this is done, but the basic system is the artist/magician takes a word phrase and cuts the words apart, removing vowels and repeated letters, until they break the word down into consonants only. They then morph together the consonants to produce a symbol. In the introduction to The Book of Pleasure (1909), Kenneth Grant speaks of Spare’s process:
“The Book of Pleasure contains a unique method of obtaining control of the subconscious energies latent in the human mind in the form of primal atavisms. It is evident that if such energy can be tapped and channeled, it can be directed to creative or destructive ends on a scale infinitely beyond anything achievable by the mind in the more limited state that characterizes ‘waking’ consciousness.”
Modern artists use this energy all the time, as with the Dadaists, the Surrealists, and the Burroughs/Gysin technique. Austin Osman Spare used this subconscious energy by focusing his will on a symbol; he would do this until he achieved a trance state. He then created automatic drawings by letting his subconscious mind control his hand. The automatism he found created drawings of bewildering exquisiteness, each one unique and filled with harmonious juxtaposition. In The Book of Automatic Drawing (2005), Spare comments on this intangible place in which the subconscious reveals itself: “All significant art, I believe, comes from that source. It is inspiration, revelation, spiritual truth, which men express in different ways they have developed.”
I can explain the sigil technique by exploring modern chaos theory and the concept known as “The Butterfly Effect.” Whatis.com refers to chaos as:
“…an apparent lack of order in a system that nevertheless obeys particular laws or rules; this understanding of chaos is synonymous with dynamical instability, a condition discovered by physicist Henri Poincare in the early 20th century that refers to an inherent lack of predictability in some physical systems. The two main components of chaos theory are the ideas that systems—no matter how complex they may be—rely upon an underlying order, and that very simple or small systems and events can cause very complex behaviors or events.”
The sigil is based upon the law that every subconscious action, despite the apparent subjective relevance, acts upon the objective reality of the physical world. The Butterfly Effect helps illustrate this by stating that a butterfly could flap its wings and influence weather patterns on the opposite side of the world. This is how the cut-up technique works. each single action, no matter how finite, determines the actions of the infinite world. Imagine it this way, if Burroughs had not shuffled his chapters of Naked Lunch (a very conscious and innovative decision that played with the collective unconscious), would the novel have had such an impact on those that had read it, and created their own works in a similar manner, such as Genesis P-Orridge’s musical work in Psychic TV and Throbbing Gristle, or David Cronenberg’s pseudo fact vs. fiction film adaptation of Naked Lunch. Cronenberg created an additional work based upon the theory of the magical act of the original, by mixing historical facts from Burrough’s life with the randomness of the novel.
The consciously random technique, in which the Dadaists were famous for, follows the same law of unpredictability; Cubism and surrealism are visual cut-ups of images. In the realm of the Surrealists, images were juxtaposed to define new outlooks. Like Austin Osman Spare’s automatic drawings, Andre Masson used a similar technique to establish himself in his work Labyrinth (1938), Colin Rhodes, in his book entitled Outsider Art: Spontaneous Alternatives (2000) defines Masson’s unconscious process.
“Starting with a web of rapidly formed lines, he worked until images began to suggest themselves, concentrating on the moment of metamorphosis when forms were in the process of turning into something else.”
Many other artists of the Dadaist/Surrealism period such as Hugo Ball, Hannah Hoch, Tristan Tzara, Kurt Schwitters, and even Man Ray, used randomized techniques to create their work.
The idea of synchronicity is based on the idea that random events can change the world. Creation is a revolutionary act, and by pulling randomness from the subconscious mind, we create something new and unique in the world. Marie-Louise Von Franz addresses this in her book On Divination And Synchronicity: The Psychology Of Meaningful Chance, by saying:
“A synchronistic event is an acausal event and is therefore, one could say, an act of creation. Jung believed in a creatio continua, like certain modern physicists who believe that there is in the world in which we live a place where from time to time new things are created. The synchronistic event would be such an act of creation.”
The middle ground between heaven and earth is where the muses breathe. In Chinese philosophy, as well as most spirit-based philosophies, the aspirant/artist/creator can consciously reach this place by dissolving illusion. Von Franz states that:
“If somebody devoid of all illusions, and all that makes the world of the ordinary ego, goes into himself with utmost sincerity, then he comes to this central hole where creation, even the cosmos, takes place. That is why the Chinese thought that certain sages or saints, very rare personalities, could reach that centre and by having come to this contained innermost centre of their personality could support heaven and earth, and be with the creation in the universe.”
The key to life is dissolving the ego and removing illusory constrained will. This rhythmic parallelism with the subconscious center is where many writers and artists tried to reach. The experience with the Four Keys substantiates this theory; the more you enter this center place, the more connected one becomes, and synchronizes, with heaven to form a harmonious sphere around the aspirant. Everything becomes a sign as to what direction the aspirant should travel.
The psychic link to these messages are like indicators of substantiation; each sign brings about a strong connection with the event until creation determines reality to be what the aspirant “sees” rather than what conventional society sees. Ben Belitt, in his essay Sight, Second, or Sudden: Versions of Witness, references Jean Cocteau’s “professional secrets of the poet” within the context of the psychic travel ways:
“…we tend to use the objects of the physical world as nomenclatural signifiers on a tabula plena rather than as events in themselves -mnemonic devices like the conventional symbols on a map or a highway, to identify habitual areas of psychic traffic.”
This tabula plena or table or gaming board is where the concepts of synchronicity and juxtaposition meet. Since the start of the mechanical age, modern man has viewed reality in a much more sterile manner, like a machine: he thinks, acts, and reflects with automatic reflex. Modern artists explore ways to remove the conscious mind from the depths of the unconscious, and like the shaman of yesteryear, they have entered the world of the game, knowing each piece fits into the whole in a unique way, trusting and playing within chaos.
Have you had a moment of synchronicity? If so comment below.
What is a daemon? The real question is, what is not a daemon? A daemon is not a demon. In Christian mythology, demons are fallen angels, malevolent forces that may wizards conjure and insecurely control. A daemon is not an earth spirit, or elemental. An elemental is a force that inhabits the four earthly manifestations of existence: fire, water, earth, and air. A daemon isn’t a remnant of someone who died. A daemon is a version of a person’s ego functioning at a higher level of existence.
Manly P. Hall, the Canadian born author, lecturer, and mystic, says this of the daemon in his hefty work entitled The Secret Teachings of All Ages: An Encyclopedic Outline of Masonic, Hermetic, Qabbalistic and Rosicrucian Symbolical Philosophy:
“The Greeks gave the name daemon to some of these elementals, especially those of the higher orders, and worshiped them. Probably the most famous of these daemons is the mysterious spirit which instructed Socrates, and whom that great philosopher spoke in the highest terms. Those who have devoted much study to the invisible constitution of man realize that it is quite probable the daemon of Socrates and the angel of Jakob Bohme were in reality not elementals, but the overshadowing divine natures of these philosophers themselves.”
Crowley also had a daemon. He refers to it as Aiwass. His Holy Guardian Angel, or Higher Self, dictated Crowley’s most famous work, The Book of the Law, to him.
In my childhood, the daemon appeared to me in a dream. At that time, I didn’t understand, but after I made the deduction almost twenty years later, my life fell into place. I have a connection to a unique history than what I was fed. I connected with a more ancient philosophical outlook.
Now, I believe the daemon is the guide to anamnesis; it reminds us of our spiritual self.
Again, I quote from Manly P. Hall:
“The instructors in the [Greek] Mysteries declared that at birth they assigned each individual an invisible patron spirit called the natal daemon. This entity was analogous to the totem of the North American Indians, except that the totem was invoked by prayer and fasting, while the daemon—being coexistent with the generating soul itself—became, as it were, the identity of the senses.”
In 2007, I faced an ordeal. Fate forced me into near-starvation because of a spiritual crisis, a situation that lasted forty days. After a romantic disaster (illustrated in detail within my novel Invisible Histories), I left my lover and needed to find a new direction in life. I was doing research at the time that focused on ancient forms of psychic communication. I built a talking board, or table, sort of like the Ouija board, but much more complex. I entered a motel room with little money, barely any food, and the talking board. There I sat for weeks, modifying my psyche.
I quote from my text:
People often ask me this question. It’s difficult to distill all my passions into a conversation soundbite, so I’m going to articulate them in this blog post.
Firstly, I’m most passionate about reading, writing, and book arts. I have a background in art. From time to time, I enjoy drawing, painting, collage, and found-object sculpture. I adore creation in all its forms. I love to cook, listen to music, watch films, dance, travel, et cetera. But I enjoy these interests at a deeper level. In conversation, I try to steer it in this direction. Strangely, I rarely discuss my ideas about philosophy, politics, or spirituality because they are too complex for mundane conversations. I never talk about the ideas behind my visual art or poetry; I find these things too personal.
I sometimes talk about my writing practice, but it’s difficult to go into detail. When I talk about this subject, I feel like I bore people. It is a challenge to explain all the moving pieces. Some close friends seem interested, but I never know if they are genuinely captivated or if they are merely being good friends. I’m unsure.
Anyway, I need to reveal more when I speak in conversations. I’m passionate about my spirituality. I had a decent conversation about magic last night—a topic that’s difficult to approach. People don't know much about the subject, so I feel like I’m leading these conversations. The depth of Rosicrucianism and Taoism makes it difficult to express these ideas to people, but I’m super passionate about both philosophies.
It’s enjoyable to talk about topics like these, but the older I get, the more specialized my interests become. It’s difficult because few people are interested in these more esoteric subjects, and even if they are, they often only have an introductory level of knowledge. It’s not their fault. Many of them are younger than me, so I don’t expect them to know much about these deeper topics. I was like that at their age.
Even so, I love talking about ideas, potentials, and possibilities. I’d much rather talk about personal evolution more than popular TV shows, movies, or computer games, but that’s what people often defer to in their conversations. I suppose it’s safer than deeper questions about existence or life, about your trials and defeats. I don’t know. I’m passionate about everything that I love. I don’t think people are passionate often. Maybe I’m different this way.
For example, when discussing music, I run into some roadblocks. Most people know I love music, but they prefer it at a more superficial level. I like to dig deep and find the hidden gems. I’m also a completist for my knowledge of a topic. Some would see this as a social currency, but I don’t look at it this way. If I speak about it, I want to understand it more thoroughly.
I want to know the history more deeply. I want to know the behind-the-scenes. That’s why I love documentaries, interviews, and journals. I’m fascinated by the process. Actually, one of my favorite assignments in college was a “process” exhibition. At a gallery in Portland, we had to show evidence of our thesis development. It was a behind-the-scenes before the finished product was unveiled. I found this rewarding and enlightening. Viewers don’t get to see the detritus or the convoluted process of creation that happens when an artist completes a project. There is a massive base under the water, but they only see the outcome.
Someday, I’d like to do a video about my writing process (you can find some more focused ones here), but it takes too much time to edit it all and still continue to write, publish, and market my work. That’s kind of what I find most frustrating about my internet videos. I enjoy thinking about what I will say and I wish I could devote more time to them. I appreciate this method better than trying to articulate my thoughts on the spot during a conversation. It’s just easier, more concise, and more focused.
Finally, what topics are you most passionate about? What are your struggles in articulating them in conversation? Post below in the comments. I’d like to know.
What Is My Work About?
Many people ask about the themes in my work. Each book is unique in relation to the others so this is difficult to deliver. I don’t repeat a formula. With that said, some common themes appear in all my novels.
Foremost, transformative experience plays an important part in all my stories. My main characters go through a “dark night of the soul.” Through these struggles, they come to some new understanding or state of being. Most times, this is a spiritual awakening or a discovery of magic. I’m quite inspired by the works of Hermann Hesse and Henry Miller, and many of their protagonists struggle with their own psychological dilemmas and existential crises.
I’m also captivated by esoteric concepts and mysticism. Most of my stories contain an element of hermetic thought. I’m fascinated with Rosicrucian doctrines and these appear throughout my work. Spiritual alchemy is an essential element in my protagonists’ transformations. These characters go through physical or spiritual initiations that uncover hidden parts of their souls. Many of these initiations reveal the transitory nature of “the moment” (my poetry also addresses this) or some lesson in Platonic anamnesis, the recovery of what we have forgotten.
Dream worlds are another key component in my work. In my first novel, The Invisible Histories of the Spiral Mountain, the protagonist’s mind fractures into two viewpoints: one is a more focused awareness of waking life, and the other is an archetypal dream world. My second novel, The Erotic Tales of Bucephalus, takes place inside a nightmarish Detroit hotel where dream logic dictates the flow of the story. My third novel, Dominique’s Confession, has the main character discovering initiatory clues within her dreams. These clues often direct her toward certain decisions and often hint at prophecy.
Tragic love stories are central to my plots. I’m interested in how these deep connections with others can transform the main characters. Like real life, many of these connections become frayed or fate drives the lovers apart. I’m obsessed with what’s left of these characters after these relationships. Do these love affairs help or hurt the character? Either way, the connections change them. Eroticism is another aspect examined in my work.
Detroit is another major character in my plots. I set all three of my novels in this ruined city, and the element of death and rebirth plays an important part in all my stories.
Despite these common themes, I experiment with different genres and plot constructions in each novel. Invisible Histories is part experiential autobiography and part magical realist fable. Bucephalus plays with erotic stereotypes. I tried to craft a poignant story about life and awakening within the traditional confines of the erotic tropes. Dominique’s Confession was a history lesson for me. I learned so much about 1920s Detroit and the once epic glamour of my ruined hometown. Through this epistolary examination of Detroit’s history, I was able to weave a love story alongside the occult conspiracies and the gang warfare of Prohibition.
That’s it until next time. If there’s anything else you want to know more about, leave a comment and I’ll try to come up with an answer.
I hale from Detroit, Michigan, a symbol of industrialized America’s collapse. Once a thriving manufacturing center, it has now fallen into disrepair. Since 1967’s race riot, the population dropped nearly 50%. Crooked mayors, hardened killers, and racial tension compliment vast tracts of unused land with 33,000 abandoned homes and 90,000 vacant lots adding up to 40 square miles of lost neighborhoods. In 2010, Detroit ranked as America’s most stressful place to live and work with the highest number of murders per capita, robberies, heart attacks, and families in poverty.
I spent my early years in suburbia. After failing at domesticity, I entered the inner city to search for wisdom amongst bohemian culture. While I ventured through a metaphysical crisis, I discovered a deeper relationship with reality. Spiritual emancipation became my obsession as I searched for divinity within literature. Henry Miller, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, and William Blake inspired my transformation as their struggles against bourgeoisie morality resonated with me, greatly influencing my writing identity. In the end, I became a storyteller who drew upon the city’s mysterious energy.
With limited opportunities, I moved to Portland to attend the Oregon College of Art and Craft, an intensive school inspired by William Morris and the Arts and Crafts movement. With a book arts concentration, I focused heavily on the book’s physicality through structure, binding, and letterpress printing. Eventually, the content became more important than the vessel as I focused on creative writing. During my thesis, I honed my craft by writing and editing my first novel for publication, The Invisible Histories of the Spiral Mountain; or The Hymns of Melchizedek (the video above details this process). I leave you with an excerpt that shows the beginning of my journey into spirit:
Until I entered the city, I lived life as a somnambulist. I was asleep. I didn’t understand sacred reality. I barely understood the profanities of society, let alone its angelic heights. Now, I want magic. I want proof. The life of a suburbanite won’t satisfy my thirst for experience. In my innocence, I don’t realize three guardians defend the Wall of Being, the barrier between anthropologist/philosopher Mircea Eliade’s concept of sacred and profane space. Systematically, I must face and conquer each one. After I defeat the three guardians, the real test begins.
Join Me on My Spiritual Journey
My name is Christopher and I’m from Detroit, Michigan. I’m a writer, book artist, and self-publisher. I’m interested in esoteric fiction, spiritual awakening, and metaphysical transformation.
On this blog, I’m going to post random thoughts about life and spiritual awakening. I will reveal behind-the-scenes information about my spiritual awakening, my writing, and my publishing process, as well as tips on creativity and other oddities that fascinate me.
I also adore arcane secrets, existential conundrums, and mysteries. I’ll crack some of these open with candid stories. I have a lot of unique experiences to share and quite a lot to say. If you like what I talk about, maybe you can subscribe for email updates.
Some blog topics I will touch on are:
I will also make blog entries talking about these concepts: duality, identity, transitions of the psyche, alternate realities, altered states, spiritual revelations, knighthood, chivalry, anamnesis, decay and rebirth.
My next blog entry will go deeper into my spiritual journey, which begins in my hometown of Detroit. Anything else you’re dying to know? Leave a comment and maybe I’ll write about it.